From: Jeremy B. Maitin-Shepard (jbms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-16 22:31:05
On Sat, 16 Aug 2003 12:28:57 +1000 "Chris Trengove"
> "Jeff Garland" <jeff_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> > I don't think the it is technically a union because the result draws
> > in points in the time period that aren't part of either of the
> > initial
> > Anyway I wrote the code as merge_inclusive so unless you have a
> > major objection I'll leave it that way pending a better idea...
> Yes, of course, it is not really a union either. I think
> merge_inclusive is fine.
How about "maximize" or "maximize_duration" or just "max" or
-- Jeremy B. Maitin-Shepard jbms_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk