Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-17 12:44:38

Next message: Paul Hamilton: "Re: [boost] Re: XMLUI (was Re: Re: UI++)"
Previous message: Paul Hamilton: "[boost] boost::io::detail::empty_buf problem with shared libs"
In reply to: Daniel Frey: "[boost] Re: 1.30.2 ready for release?"
Next in thread: Martin Wille: "[boost] Re: 1.30.2 ready for release?"

At 04:09 PM 8/16/2003, Daniel Frey wrote:

>Ah, I see. I also saw from Beman's results for the main trunk that the
>fix for checked_delete works as expected. One nit: Beman, you added
>annotations that explain why a test failed. Now the test passes, but the
>annotation is still there...

The note will be gone next run.

Thanks,

--Beman

Next message: Paul Hamilton: "Re: [boost] Re: XMLUI (was Re: Re: UI++)"
Previous message: Paul Hamilton: "[boost] boost::io::detail::empty_buf problem with shared libs"
In reply to: Daniel Frey: "[boost] Re: 1.30.2 ready for release?"
Next in thread: Martin Wille: "[boost] Re: 1.30.2 ready for release?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk