[boost] Re: circular_buffer ver. 3.3

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-09-03 06:32:16

"Pavel Vozenilek" <pavel_vozenilek_at_[hidden]> writes:

> "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> news:uwucq299t.fsf_at_boost-consulting.com...
> ...
>> Is there some reason you're defining your own iterators instead of
>> using iterator_facade or iterator_adaptor?
>>
> iterator_adaptor is used here, AFAICS.

Normally you don't define your own operator[], which is why I assumed
it was not.  It might make sense if you really want operator[] to
return a reference, I guess.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com