From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-04 22:59:38
Pavol Droba <droba_at_[hidden]> writes:
> There was a great effort put into in the current implementation to
> make it work on defficient compilers. Workarounds are easier to
> implement using monolitic approach. This is probably also major reason
> why I was supporting it.
> I would suggest to define the new interface, and implement it on
> top of the current one for now.
OK, I give up.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk