From: Hugo Duncan (hugoduncan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-22 12:50:31
Michael Stevens <Michael.Stevens_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> The documentation issue with Random numbers has been worrying me for a
> while. Jens dropped the new (standard proposed) code into CVS a couple
> of month ago. Apart from a couple of typos and problems with gcc-2.95.3
> it looks good.
As mentioned previously, bcc56 also has problems with
silently generating incorrect code.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk