From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-23 02:40:44
Douglas Paul Gregor writes:
>> Oh, duh. This is what Haskell calls "uncurry". Wow! Ok, so the long
>> and the short of it is that I should be writing
>> |= case<Add>( uncurry( eval(_1)+eval(_2) ) )
> Ah ha! That's the right term. Even if the rest of this discussion goes
> nowhere, we should probably write uncurry...
We are almost there already:
uncurry(f)(t) === apply(f,t)
where 'apply' is available from here - http://tinyurl.com/s0g6.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk