[boost] Re: [string algo review] exception specification

From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-25 12:38:08

"Pavol Droba" <droba_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:20031025141527.GX22941_at_lenin.felcer.sk...
> [...]
> Assume, that all algorithms in this library can provide the
> basic guarantie if arguments fulfill this requirement too.
> Is it enough to make put this statement on one place and
> comment only functions with exceptional properties (i.e.
> those, that can provide stronger guarantie for common
> argument types)?

That probably isn't unreasonable.

> It the previous is accptable, it might be also possible to
> identify some groups of functions with the properties
> allowing to give a stronger guarantie, under common
> conditions.
>
> Thus having only a few exceptions for documenting
> explicitly.

Try it out your way, and someone will let you know if you
should give more information. ;)

Dave

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.521 / Virus Database: 319 - Release Date: 9/23/2003