From: Christopher Currie (christopher_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-29 11:05:34
Cheenu Srinivasan wrote:
> Thanks for the note. Thats bad news indeed as I am not at liberty to
> upgrade the compiler on our production systems. However ... it's
> boost.spirit that I am trying to use. Does it need all the MPL stuff?
My initial investigation says no; someone who uses Spirit might know
better. However, Spirit's power comes from its extensive use of
templates, and the Sun C++ compiler just can't handle the complexity.
This may change in the future, so I'd keep an eye on the Spirit website:
Particularly the page in their documentation on portability:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk