Re: Hopefully merged CRC fixes; need more GCC help (was: Re: [boost] Boost.CRC regressions)

From: Douglas Gregor (gregod_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-02 14:03:14

On Sunday 02 November 2003 04:15 am, Daryle Walker wrote:
> On 10/29/03 6:15 AM, "Martin Wille" <mw8329_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > Boost.CRC's crc_test regresses for gcc-3.1 and gcc-3.2.3 on Linux.
> >
> > The same regressions were fixed for the 1.30.2 release. However, the
> > fixes didn't make it into the trunc.
>
> I tried merging for the first time.  I (hopefully) put the changes from the
> 1.30.2 version of <boost/crc.hpp> into the current CVS version.  Can one of
> the administrators check that the change made it in?

Looks like they are there...

> I couldn't compile the CRC test or example files with my GCC (the custom
> gcc-3.1 Apple uses for Mac OS X 10.2).  Applying the change did little
> difference.  The error from the example stayed the same.  However, the
> extra errors in the test went away.  (The errors in the test file that were
> similar to the one in the example file remained.  The compiler is having a
> missing link error; the CRC table from a detail base class isn't being
> created.)  Maybe the regression computers will fare better.
>
> Daryle

Everything is okay on Linux GCC 3.2.3 for me.

        Doug