From: Douglas Gregor (gregod_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-02 14:03:14
On Sunday 02 November 2003 04:15 am, Daryle Walker wrote:
> On 10/29/03 6:15 AM, "Martin Wille" <mw8329_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > Boost.CRC's crc_test regresses for gcc-3.1 and gcc-3.2.3 on Linux.
> > The same regressions were fixed for the 1.30.2 release. However, the
> > fixes didn't make it into the trunc.
> I tried merging for the first time. I (hopefully) put the changes from the
> 1.30.2 version of <boost/crc.hpp> into the current CVS version. Can one of
> the administrators check that the change made it in?
Looks like they are there...
> I couldn't compile the CRC test or example files with my GCC (the custom
> gcc-3.1 Apple uses for Mac OS X 10.2). Applying the change did little
> difference. The error from the example stayed the same. However, the
> extra errors in the test went away. (The errors in the test file that were
> similar to the one in the example file remained. The compiler is having a
> missing link error; the CRC table from a detail base class isn't being
> created.) Maybe the regression computers will fare better.
Everything is okay on Linux GCC 3.2.3 for me.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk