From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-07 06:58:41
> If header-only developers should read this document, then it is
> misnamed and it should clearly indicate what applies to
> header-only and "separate source" libraries.
Good point, normally they probably don't need to worry about it, it's only
when the binary interface of a library-with-source is dependent upon one
without that some inter-library-negotiation may be required.
Thanks for the corrections as well BTW.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk