From: Paul A. Bristow (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-24 18:53:48
| -----Original Message-----
| From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
| [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]]On Behalf Of Matthias Schabel
| Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 1:58 AM
| To: Boost mailing list
| Subject: Re: [boost] new compile-time dimensional analysis and unit
| Agreed - anyway, if we're the only two on this list who are interested
| in such
| a beast, which I'm starting to suspect from the general lack of other
You should not interpret lack of comment as lack of interest.
I am sure I am not the only one in lurk mode on this issue.
But to come to a collective view, we need a working system with at least some
Most importantly IMO we need many examples to show the very many scientists
(unprofessional programmers) how it works in practice, and how it helps them
write error free code. Barton and Nackmann and NIST work has showed how it
might work, but not the elegant portable and flexible solution that now looks
PS For me, implicit conversions are usually a bad idea: quick but dirty.
Paul A Bristow, Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria, LA8 8AB UK
+44 1539 561830 Mobile +44 7714 33 02 04
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk