[boost] Re: safe_bool alternative?

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-24 19:45:03

Douglas Paul Gregor <gregod_at_[hidden]> writes:

> On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, David Abrahams wrote:
>> > I think a fast-track review would be appropriate, and it seems to meet all
>> > of the criteria.
>>
>> Does it?  Which library is using it?
>
> Function and shared_ptr use the safe_bool idiom, and I'm sure it's in
> other places as well (Optional, perhaps?). 

I know that.  I was asking about bool_testable.  Wasn't that the
component under discussion?  It's a completely different technique,
IMO.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com