From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-24 19:26:41
David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Douglas Paul Gregor <gregod_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, David Abrahams wrote:
>>>> I think a fast-track review would be appropriate, and it seems to meet all
>>>> of the criteria.
>>> Does it? Which library is using it?
>> Function and shared_ptr use the safe_bool idiom, and I'm sure it's in
>> other places as well (Optional, perhaps?).
> I know that. I was asking about bool_testable. Wasn't that the
> component under discussion? It's a completely different technique,
I thought so. IMO, it is safe_bool that should get a fast-track review.
In the review, proponents of bool_testable can make their case.
-- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk