[boost] Re: safe_bool alternative?

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-24 22:56:32

"Joel de Guzman" <joel_at_[hidden]> writes:

>> I know that.  I was asking about bool_testable.  Wasn't that the
>> component under discussion?  It's a completely different technique,
>> IMO.
>
> I thought so. IMO, it is safe_bool that should get a fast-track
> review.

safe_bool is an idiom, not a library component.  Anyone's already free
to use the idiom.  I don't think we can review it on that basis.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com