|
Boost : |
From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-22 20:39:35
Hi Vincent
"Vincent Finn" <vincent.finn_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:384euv4pmgne18ngsnqrfvrpkjg4spb6er_at_4ax.com...
[snip]
> The first is is it possible for the header not to include all the STL
> headers?
> I know why it is done and that it doesn't really cost anything but I
> am always reluctant to include headers I don't need
they should only be included on vc6 and other platforms should not
need them. It might not be fixed yet in the code.
> The second question is should the function P() be in the assign
> namespace. I know it is a trivial function but it is needed to make
> using the library on maps useful so I would imagine people will have
> to keep defining it if it isn't supplied
P() i basically short for std::make_pair. But for maps you can just
2-arguments style list, eg.,
std::map<std::string, int> m;
m += ( "two", 2 )("three", 3);
So is there really any need for P()?
> Other than that it's great :-)
Thanks.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk