|
Boost : |
From: AlisdairM (alisdair.meredith_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-23 07:05:23
"John Maddock" <john_at_[hidden]> wrote in
news:019601c3c94a$a529d190$f3300252_at_fuji:
> I hope Alisdair won't mind me forwarding this one, but I'm really
> beginning to wonder where SCO are going next, BTW isn't there some
> clause in ISO standards that prevents retrospective claims on
> standardised interfaces (or does that apply to patents only)?
As we're in a more public forum, I'll add that I always take Register
stories with a pinch of salt, so I'd certainly like confirmation from a
closer source. I have no idea what the specific claims on ctype.h etc.
are, simply that they appear to be mentioned by name.
AlisdairM
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk