From: Pavel Vozenilek (pavel_vozenilek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-23 13:13:31
"Samuel Krempp" <krempp_at_[hidden]> wrote
> > Do you plan to add operator=(const char*) into format?
> Is using the parse(string) method unpractical ?
> The meaning of assigning from string is probably clear, but it's less
> explicit than parse(), and I wouldn't define 2 functions for the same
> feature. So unless the operator= has a practical advantage over the
> parse() member func, I'll keep parse()..
The operator=() is natural and doesn't require looking into docs.
I coudn't find any mention of function parse() in documentation.
Maybe the name reset() is more intuitive.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk