RE: [boost] Bagging a boost namespace

From: Paul A. Bristow (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-25 12:54:55

| -----Original Message-----
| From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
| [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]]On Behalf Of Daryle Walker
| Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 12:21 AM
| To: Boost mailing list
| Subject: Re: [boost] Bagging a boost namespace
|
| On 1/22/04 4:11 AM, "Andy Little" <andy_at_[hidden]> wrote:
|
| If you're talking about your Units stuff, maybe it could go into a "science"
| namespace.  Other people's science-stuff would go here too.  If you separate
| the dimension-analysis stuff, maybe that could go into the "math" namespace.
| If it's separated further with tagged types, that last stuff could go with
| the 'utility' items.

We have also identified a need for physical constants (which have uncertainty
and units, in contrast to math constants).

But IMO this should wait until we have got the math constants problem cracked.

Paul

Paul A Bristow, Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria, LA8 8AB  UK
[phone]   Mobile [phone]
mailto:pbristow_at_[hidden]