[boost] Re: Re: [administrative] Formal Review Process

From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-25 17:56:05

"Jens Maurer" <Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:40143F1D.2070005_at_gmx.net...
>
> David Abrahams wrote:
> > Thomas and I discussed both options (I think [review] would be a
more
> > appropriate tag).  The thing I like about the mailing list is that
> > review commentary has a value all its own, and it would be great
to be
> > able to search reviews separately.
>
> Just to clarify: The "boost-review" list would be for review
requests
> only, the actual review still happening on the main boost list?
>
> Discussion on the library itself should probably not be fractioned
> into the regular boost discussion and boost-review.
>

How about keeping the discussion of libraries on the main list, but
forwarding a copy of each message in which a poster votes yes or no to
the review list? The review manager could forward the messages,
perhaps with subjects like "[Library] Reviewer - Yes".

Jonathan