Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Giovanni Bajo (giovannibajo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-07 10:32:06

Next message: Neal Becker: "[boost] Re: Is the release boost_1_31_0.tar.gz file OK?"
Previous message: Reece Dunn: "Re: [boost] Is the release boost_1_31_0.tar.gz file OK?"
In reply to: Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve: "Re: [boost] Re: latest gcc 3.4 + Boost 1.30.0 OK"

Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve wrote:

> Apparently the bug was fixed in the meantime. I.e. I don't
> think there are any Boost.Python/gcc3.4 issues left. :)

Great! Thanks for the report!

-- 
Giovanni Bajo

Next message: Neal Becker: "[boost] Re: Is the release boost_1_31_0.tar.gz file OK?"
Previous message: Reece Dunn: "Re: [boost] Is the release boost_1_31_0.tar.gz file OK?"
In reply to: Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve: "Re: [boost] Re: latest gcc 3.4 + Boost 1.30.0 OK"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk