Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Neal Becker (ndbecker_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-07 10:18:25

Next message: Angus Leeming: "[boost] [function] bug in docs?"
Previous message: Giovanni Bajo: "[boost] Re: Re: latest gcc 3.4 + Boost 1.30.0 OK"
In reply to: Beman Dawes: "[boost] Is the release boost_1_31_0.tar.gz file OK?"
Next in thread: Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve: "Re: [boost] Is the release boost_1_31_0.tar.gz file OK?"

Beman Dawes wrote:

> I've had a report that boost_1_31_0.tar.gz gets a checksum error halfway
> through unzipping.
>
> Has anyone else had a problem? Or used the file successfully?
>
No problem here (linux, gnutar)

Next message: Angus Leeming: "[boost] [function] bug in docs?"
Previous message: Giovanni Bajo: "[boost] Re: Re: latest gcc 3.4 + Boost 1.30.0 OK"
In reply to: Beman Dawes: "[boost] Is the release boost_1_31_0.tar.gz file OK?"
Next in thread: Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve: "Re: [boost] Is the release boost_1_31_0.tar.gz file OK?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk