Boost logo

Boost :

From: Alexander Terekhov (terekhov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-09 17:30:31

David Abrahams wrote:
> > thrown (or may be something equivalent to 'unexpected'). If it is
> > derived from a declared one, it will be sliced.
> Is everyone convinced that propagating the exception into the joining
> thread is the right behavior or even semantically sensible?

I'm convinced that propagating *unexpected* exceptions into the
joining thread is totally wrong and insensible.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at