From: Victor A. Wagner, Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-10 00:57:12
At Monday 2004-02-09 15:30, you wrote:
>David Abrahams wrote:
> > > thrown (or may be something equivalent to 'unexpected'). If it is
> > > derived from a declared one, it will be sliced.
> > Is everyone convinced that propagating the exception into the joining
> > thread is the right behavior or even semantically sensible?
>I'm convinced that propagating *unexpected* exceptions into the
>joining thread is totally wrong and insensible.
would you rather abort the application??
>Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
"There oughta be a law"
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk