Boost logo

Boost :

From: Victor A. Wagner, Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-10 00:57:12

At Monday 2004-02-09 15:30, you wrote:

>David Abrahams wrote:
> > > thrown (or may be something equivalent to 'unexpected'). If it is
> > > derived from a declared one, it will be sliced.
> >
> > Is everyone convinced that propagating the exception into the joining
> > thread is the right behavior or even semantically sensible?
>I'm convinced that propagating *unexpected* exceptions into the
>joining thread is totally wrong and insensible.

would you rather abort the application??

>Unsubscribe & other changes:

Victor A. Wagner Jr.
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
               "There oughta be a law"

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at