From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-18 07:35:58
Russell Hind wrote:
> Pavel Vozenilek wrote:
>> 3. It is far from clear if there will be new Borland C++ compiler at
>> all. Borland may decide to drop out of C++ market completely -
>> it may be waste to spend effort with beta until things get clear.
> In that case again, why should boost keep supporting it if Borland
Because I may want to? Why should I be prevented from supporting bcc if I so
desire? Should I be forced to run my own regression tests in order to
provide that support?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk