Re: [boost] Re: [utility] question on prior(x,n)

From: Daniel Wallin (dalwan01_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-25 06:46:45

Daniel Frey wrote:
> David Abrahams wrote:
> 
>> Daniel Frey <daniel.frey_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>
>>> Providing the implementation for next/prior in the documentation might
>>> be sufficient for the one-argument-version, but for the two argument
>>> version it's quite hard to help getting the implementation bug-free if
>>> I don't know what you intended. Can you write down original intent,
>>> please?
>>
>>
>> Well, you came up with the 2-arg version.
> 
> 
> That was Daniel Wallin (too many Daniels error?). I guess this also 
> explains why I had the feeling we were talking past each other a bit :)

No it wasn't, must have been be some other Daniel. ;)

-- 
Daniel Wallin