From: Stefan Seefeld (seefeld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-25 13:36:16
Phil Richards wrote:
> I think most people would understand "io" as an abbreviation with no
> real potential for confusion. (And if they are confused, I hate to think
> what they will think an "iostream" is.) If the stuff ever made it into
> the standard, then you'd get "std::io" which would make ex-C
> programmers happy too.
and yet...I associate 'io' with reading and writing, i.e. things related
to some *content*, while in boost::filesystem we are more talking about
content *containers* and how to deal with them.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk