From: Pavel Vozenilek (pavel_vozenilek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-05-15 01:45:31
"David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > Anyway it seems like a high priority that the more
> > experienced boost guys should get a basic version of this pushed
> > through before we get 20 slightly different versions sneaking in via
> > the libraries being incorporated into boost.
> We don't "get ____ pushed through", though. Someone has to make a
> library proposal.
Its IMO problem for small utilities - they do not qualify as libraries
and there's no reliable mechanism to get them reviewed and possibly
included in Boost. Its easier for library author to add his own version in.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk