|
|
Boost : |
From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-05-15 07:00:29
On Sat, 15 May 2004 08:45:31 +0200, Pavel Vozenilek wrote
> Its IMO problem for small utilities - they do not qualify as
> libraries and there's no reliable mechanism to get them reviewed and
> possibly included in Boost.
Don't agree. That's what fasttrack reviews are for:
http://www.boost.org/more/formal_review_process.htm#Fast-Track
enable_if was reviewed using this process.
>Its easier for library author to add his own version in.
Very true, especially if it is an implementation detail. Dave's point is
someone has to step up and volunteer to do the documentation work, etc. Like
it or not, it won't happen without a volunteer...
Jeff
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk