[boost] Re: Latest ScopeGuard

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-05-15 07:07:37

"Pavel Vozenilek" <pavel_vozenilek_at_[hidden]> writes:

> "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> > Anyway it seems like a high priority that the more
>> > experienced boost guys should get a basic version of this pushed
>> > through before we get 20 slightly different versions sneaking in via
>> > the libraries being incorporated into boost.
>>
>> We don't "get ____ pushed through", though.  Someone has to make a
>> library proposal.
>>
> Its IMO problem for small utilities - they do not qualify as
> libraries

Why do you say that?

> and there's no reliable mechanism to get them reviewed and possibly
> included in Boost. Its easier for library author to add his own
> version in.

What about the "fast track review process?"

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-consulting.com