[boost] Re: Re: Re: Re: Pretty Good Initialization Library

From: Andrei Alexandrescu \(See Website for Email\) (andrewalex_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-10 01:43:15

"Vladimir Prus" <ghost_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:200407100957.39472.ghost_at_cs.msu.su...
> Andrei Alexandrescu (See Website for Email) wrote:
>
> > > But the same user will be equally unprepared to unspecified evaluation
> .......
> > > in
> > >
> > >    A = get(), get(), get();
> > >
> > > and in
> > >
> > >    A.assign_list(get())(get())(get()) ;
> > >
> > > There's nothing specific about operator,();
> >
> > There is, sigh. operator,() has a special regime among operators. It's
> > called the /sequencing/ operator.
>
> Uhm :-( It seems you did not read the part of my email which said *the
same
> user*. The user which does not care about possibly different
initialization
> order probably does not care about special properties of operator,().

I have had. No change in my answer. :o)

> As Andras Erdei the gap between people who know about special properties
of
> operator(), and those who know that overloaded version does not have that
> properties is very, very narrow.

Let's not forget that this basis is just a conjecture.

Andrei