From: Guillaume Melquiond (guillaume.melquiond_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-21 07:49:13
Le mer 21/07/2004 à 14:25, Synge Todo a écrit :
> From: David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]>
> Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 07:20:20 -0400
> > > I am a bit confused. Can "using std::pow;" be accepted by the
> > > compilers without a declaration of std::pow?
> > No it can't.
> Thank you, David. It means that we have to always include <cmath>
> beforehand whenever we include Boost.Random headers, since it contains
> a line declaring "using std:pow;". This applies even if we just
> include Boost.Random headers without any instantiation of Boost.Random
> class templates. Isn't this requirement too strong for users???
No, I would say it means Boost.Random should include <cmath>. It's what
you were suggesting at first (I think it was you). It's also what the
other Boost libraries do (at least the Interval library does it).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk