Re: [boost] Re: [config] seems like VC 8.0 needs BOOST_NO_MEMBER_TEMPLATE_FRIENDS

From: Victor A. Wagner Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-27 04:02:20

At Tuesday 2004-07-27 01:09, you wrote:
>On Tuesday 27 July 2004 00:42, JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z <joaquin_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> > error C2888: 'void
>boost::multi_index::safe_mode::detach_equivalent_iterators(Iterator &)' :
>symbol cannot be defined within namespace 'detail'
>
>The error seems to indicate a namespace problem rather then something 
>specific
>to member template friends?
>
> > > I've searched through the VC 2005 beta docs and,
> > allegedly, member template friends are supported, so this
> > particular problem could be a bug rather than complete
> > lack of support for this feature. Maybe someone with
> > local access to VC 8.0 can test the above code and
> > see what happens (I currently don't have the time
> > and resources to try myself.)
>
>Maybe the problem is related to namespace handling in VC 8.0
>
>Boost.numeric.interval library fails when included in uBLAS due to a curious
>namespace problem.
>http://www.meta-comm.com/engineering/boost-regression/developer/output/RudbekAssociates-bin-boost-libs-numeric-ublas-test7-test-vc8-0-debug.html
>
>The same problem effect VC 7.1 as well. Why the compilers think the 'lower'
>'upper' symbols are ambiguous I have no idea!

because there are two different ones to choose from

>--
>Michael
>
>___________________________________
>Michael Stevens Systems Engineering
>
>Navigation Systems, Estimation  and
>                  Bayesian Filtering
>     http://bayesclasses.sf.net
>___________________________________
>_______________________________________________
>Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Victor A. Wagner Jr.      http://rudbek.com
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
               "There oughta be a law"