[boost] Re: Review Wizard Status Report

From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-28 23:57:48

Jeff Garland wrote:
> [...]
> 1) The review schedule is too aggressive.  One week per review with no breaks
> is going to kill us and not give enough time for complete reviews.  1.5 weeks
> with .5 weeks in-between is more doable.  This also gives some buffer for
> review run-overs.  The current week is a reasonable exception because we have
> 2 libraries that overlap the same area.
> [...]

I'll second the idea that more time is not a bad thing. ;)

> 4) These periodic reports are great -- keep up the good work!

And I'll second this sentiment as well.

Dave