From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-30 18:23:02
Thomas Wenisch <twenisch_at_[hidden]> writes:
> On Sat, 28 Aug 2004, tom brinkman wrote:
>> If there are no objections, starting with the "More IO" library, I will
>> attach an ID number to each reviewed library. Please reference this ID
>> number in any postings to the group. This will help in organizing the
>> reviews and assist in searching for related postings.
>> The following libraries still require review manager volunteers:
>> 10006 - Named Parms
>> 10007 - Policy Pointer
>> 10008 - Wave
>> 10009 - Finite State Machine (FSM)
>> 10010 - Fixed Strings
> It may not be worth renumbering things at this point, but I would suggest
> that you prefix library IDs with the current year rather than an arbitrary
> large number. In otherwords More IO would be 2004-01.
What is the point of these IDs? It seems like it adds busywork for
reviewers and no especially useful information. Now we're talking
about making them more complicated...
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk