[boost] Re: [boost.range] renaming empty() to is_empty()

From: Jurko Gospodnetic (jurko_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-03 04:15:43

> I'd vote no (i.e., I'd stick with empty). It is admittedly a bad name, but
it's even worse
> to depart from STL terminology. I don't think it'll pose that many
problems since
> anybody who delves into Boost.Range will be already familiar with STL
containers
> and the empty() memfun.

  Second that.

  Regards,
    Jurko