From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-21 05:47:04
Reece Dunn wrote:
>>2. If primary target is collection formatting wouldn't it be better to
>>name library "collection formats something"?
> This is a good idea. The name is from when the library just had output
> support, thus the "outfmt" directory in the sandbox. I am thinking about
> moving to a "formatter" directory. What do other people think?
I'm -1. Having "format" and "formatter" is confusing. The name should
somehow mention that you format data structures.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk