[boost] RE: OutFrmt lib design questions

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-21 05:47:04

Reece Dunn wrote:

>>2. If primary target is collection formatting wouldn't it be better to
>>name library "collection formats something"?
> 
> This is a good idea. The name is from when the library just had output
> support, thus the "outfmt" directory in the sandbox. I am thinking about
> moving to a "formatter" directory. What do other people think?

I'm -1. Having "format" and "formatter" is confusing. The name should
somehow mention that you format data structures.

- Volodya