From: Guillaume Melquiond (guillaume.melquiond_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-28 08:20:13
Le mar 28/09/2004 à 14:18, Aleksey Gurtovoy a écrit :
> Guillaume Melquiond writes:
> > Le dim 26/09/2004 à 09:40, Aleksey Gurtovoy a écrit :
> > > Hmm, it looks like GCC 2.95.3/STLPort didn't get covered by the patch
> > > -- http://tinyurl.com/6e3g5. Is this something we can fix easily?
> > I have committed a small patch. Let's see if it fixes things. I can't be
> > sure it will work since my version of STL is 4.6 and I don't have these
> > problems.
> It did! Once again, thanks everybody!
I'm surprised it worked that well. Except for the last one, all the
tests now pass. They shouldn't, since a deficiency with respect to name
resolution should prevent some cmp*.cpp tests from passing (as can be
seen with gcc-2.95.3-linux report). Martin, is the compiler really GCC
2.95 for the STLport tests?
As for the last test (test_float), it seems the compiler does not find
the abs(float) and abs(double) functions. The compilation warning shows
only abs(int) is defined.
I guess the problem lies in the current test code:
I am not so sure it was a good heuristic. So I committed a small patch
that unconditionally put std::abs and std::sqrt in the current namespace
for test/test_float.cpp. My quick tests on Linux don't show any
difference. Let's see how well it behaves on Windows (maybe some
problems with Intel compiler in MSVC6 emulation mode?).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk