From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-28 16:26:34
> > It basically your choice, but why wouldn't you. I keep repeating during
> > formal reviews that test programs could be enhanced here and there would
> > use Boost.Test (and all it's tools).
> I'd rather change it to use at least the minimal test framework, otherwise
> don't see how these results are interpreted.
> But then I don't know if there is someone expecting the particular format
> this result and parsing it. If that's the case, my "fix" will we
> as a failure.
> Fernando Cacciola
Boost.Test is safe bet in this regard. Test program output will definitely
be accepted and processed properly but Boost.Build.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk