From: Fernando Cacciola (fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-28 16:38:00
"Gennadiy Rozental" <gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden]> escribió en el mensaje
> > > It basically your choice, but why wouldn't you. I keep repeating
> > > formal reviews that test programs could be enhanced here and there
> > you
> > > use Boost.Test (and all it's tools).
> > >
> > I'd rather change it to use at least the minimal test framework,
> > don't see how these results are interpreted.
> > But then I don't know if there is someone expecting the particular
> > this result and parsing it. If that's the case, my "fix" will we
> > as a failure.
> > Fernando Cacciola
> > SciSoft
> Boost.Test is safe bet in this regard. Test program output will definitely
> be accepted and processed properly but Boost.Build.
OK... I'll change it then
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk