|
Boost : |
From: Fernando Cacciola (fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-28 16:38:00
"Gennadiy Rozental" <gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden]> escribió en el mensaje
news:cjckub$eel$1_at_sea.gmane.org...
> > > It basically your choice, but why wouldn't you. I keep repeating
during
> > > formal reviews that test programs could be enhanced here and there
would
> > you
> > > use Boost.Test (and all it's tools).
> > >
> > I'd rather change it to use at least the minimal test framework,
otherwise
> I
> > don't see how these results are interpreted.
> > But then I don't know if there is someone expecting the particular
format
> of
> > this result and parsing it. If that's the case, my "fix" will we
> interpreted
> > as a failure.
> >
> > Fernando Cacciola
> > SciSoft
>
> Boost.Test is safe bet in this regard. Test program output will definitely
> be accepted and processed properly but Boost.Build.
>
> Gennadiy.
>
OK... I'll change it then
Thanks
Fernando Cacciola
SciSoft
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk