From: Fernando Cacciola (fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-29 07:45:44
"Aleksey Gurtovoy" <agurtovoy_at_[hidden]> escribió en el mensaje
> Fernando Cacciola writes:
> > According to the regression summary, the new numeric conversion library
> > in pretty good shape(thanks to Joaquín Muñoz for his latest fixes!)
> > I want to test how far can the new "numeric_cast<>" replace the old one.
> The newly checked-in tests significantly disturbed the regressions
> picture --
> A number of people are working hard clearing up all these red and yellow
> cells so that we can branch for release, and any new failures, even
> easy-to-fix ones, are not helping.
> FYI, I had to correct a number of trivial errors in both tests you've
> simply in order to make them compile. Please try to exercise more caution
> next time you check things in.
I run the tests locally before commiting but against another copy. I just
looked that there were all **passed** and missed the fact that the new test
was not there.
But then I commit the right copy.
Anyway these are just excuses.
I'll pay more attention to what I'm doing next time.
BTW: I've updated to get your fixes and run the test locally (correctly this
time), and it passes now. So I'll just leave it as that.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk