From: Pavol Droba (droba_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-29 09:00:23
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 01:58:06PM +0200, Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
> "Pavol Droba" <droba_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> | On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 09:33:23AM +0200, Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
> | >
> | > copy_range<string>( *it ) should do the work.
> | >
> | Actualy I thought, that we may add a member function to the iterator range.
> | So that the syntax would be like:
> | it->copy<string>();
> Inside a dependent type context this would be
> it-> template copy<string>();
> I think. besides, I don't like the idea of adding more stuff to
> iterator_range. The Pavol Droba I knew used to be a proponent of
> free-standing functions :-)
Oh yeah. That was probably just one of ideas that just popped up in my mind and
never should get out of it.
I was little bit misleaded by Gennadiy's effort to simplify the handling.
This is obviously not the way.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk