From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-29 06:58:06
"Pavol Droba" <droba_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
| On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 09:33:23AM +0200, Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
| > copy_range<string>( *it ) should do the work.
| Actualy I thought, that we may add a member function to the iterator range.
| So that the syntax would be like:
Inside a dependent type context this would be
it-> template copy<string>();
I think. besides, I don't like the idea of adding more stuff to
iterator_range. The Pavol Droba I knew used to be a proponent of
free-standing functions :-)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk