From: Russell Hind (rh_gmane_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-04 02:35:03
Beman Dawes wrote:
> So presumably you would be in favor of changing the default to "no_check"?
I'd be happy with 'no_check' as default and as Jeff mentioned, backwards
compatibility wouldn't be a concern for me either. I'm happy to alter
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk