From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-13 11:08:14
"Howard Hinnant" <hinnant_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> On Oct 12, 2004, at 6:56 PM, Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
> >> Buy Metrowerks Pro 9 and you will see it. :-)
> > For some reason I thought it used parts of the Boost code base. I
> > gather I was
> > wrong?
> I implemented it from the TR1 spec.
Don't get me wrong -- I knew you could do it yourself ;-)
> Peter Dimov was a tremendous help
> though (jeeze that guy is smart! :-) ). And as Peter recently pointed
> > But legalese aside, the most important part of the implementation are
> > the tests, anyway. ;-)
> I'd agree 100%, but without the smiley. The shared_ptr/weak_ptr spec
> implies some of the most subtle code I've ever tried to implement.
I'm surprised -- but I probably shouldn't be. To be honest, I haven't used weak
pointers since I programmed in Java. Each time I've thought I needed weak_ptr
I've always ended up adopting some other solution. But now you have me very
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk