Re: [boost] [Formal review request] const_string

From: Reece Dunn (msclrhd_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-17 17:44:42

Jeff Garland wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 22:00:52 +0400, Maxim Yegorushkin wrote
> 
>>Recent postings showed interest in an immutable string facility [*]. 
>>Its  interface and implementation has now reached a stable state (I 
>>hope).
>>
>>I am formally requesting that const_string be added to the review queue.
> 
> Wasn't there some discussion of merging this proposal with the fixed_string
> stuff and reviewing it together -- looks like that's been decided against?

I haven't heard anything against the merger. I am pro merger, since it 
will allow const_string, fixed_string and flex_string/basic_string_impl 
to all be reviewed as one since they have related functionality.

Regards,
Reece