From: Reece Dunn (msclrhd_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-17 17:44:42
Jeff Garland wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 22:00:52 +0400, Maxim Yegorushkin wrote
>>Recent postings showed interest in an immutable string facility [*].
>>Its interface and implementation has now reached a stable state (I
>>I am formally requesting that const_string be added to the review queue.
> Wasn't there some discussion of merging this proposal with the fixed_string
> stuff and reviewing it together -- looks like that's been decided against?
I haven't heard anything against the merger. I am pro merger, since it
will allow const_string, fixed_string and flex_string/basic_string_impl
to all be reviewed as one since they have related functionality.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk