From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-20 11:06:50
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 00:15:52 -0500, David B. Held wrote
> Steve Hutton wrote:
> > [...]
> > So the relevance of ODBC is open to debate - the key IMHO is uniform
> > support for all the major databases. ODBC may be a quick means to
> > that end. Native drivers can always be added later, or vise-versa.
> In my experience, ODBC can be unbelievably slow, also. It is definitely
> not a cure-all. It should probably be supported, but creating an
> interface that will elegantly support native drivers should be a
Sure having good support for native drivers is fine, but I think it is much,
much, harder to achieve. So my push for ODBC binding is primarily to meet the
'all major databases' supported quickly.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk