|
|
Boost : |
From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-22 18:53:17
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 18:31:14 -0500, Rene Rivera wrote
> What I don't want to be forced to do is change every instance of
> log<*>::*(...) in all my code as it would literally take me weeks to
> do it, and to test it.
>
> Not that I'm saying it would not be possible for me to use something
> that is macro based. What I'm saying is that it's guaranteed to be
> possible to make that switch with a macro-less supporting solution.
Got it...
Jeff
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk