From: Maciej Sobczak (prog_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-23 04:02:22
Jeff Garland wrote:
> I moved your thoughts to the main page of discussion -- somehow you wound up
> on a closely related, but not the same name page...
I also noticed there is a "competing" page:
Is it useful to have both?
>>6) Allows for the user of the library to "plug in" thier own binding
>>\ subscription system. (to support bound controls) "
> Can you clarify what you mean by 'bound controls'?
I second the requirement, but with different interpretation.
I think it is good to have the possibility to difine bindings for
user-defined datatypes. Specializing a given class template is one way
to achieve this variation point and is consistent with how it is done in
-- Maciej Sobczak : http://www.msobczak.com/ Programming : http://www.msobczak.com/prog/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk