Boost logo

Boost :

From: Maciej Sobczak (prog_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-23 04:02:22

Jeff Garland wrote:

> I moved your thoughts to the main page of discussion -- somehow you wound up
> on a closely related, but not the same name page...

I also noticed there is a "competing" page:

Is it useful to have both?

>>6) Allows for the user of the library to "plug in" thier own binding
>>\ subscription system. (to support bound controls) "
> Can you clarify what you mean by 'bound controls'?

I second the requirement, but with different interpretation.
I think it is good to have the possibility to difine bindings for
user-defined datatypes. Specializing a given class template is one way
to achieve this variation point and is consistent with how it is done in

Maciej Sobczak :
Programming    :

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at