Re: [boost] Re: Boost Iterable Range Library update (v1.5)

From: Roland Weiss (weissr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-08 09:01:14

John Torjo wrote:

> 
>>> No comments of the code itself, however I'm not a fan of rng as a
>>> namespace, I keep reading Random Number Generator.
>>> helpfully though I can't think of an alternative!
>>>
>>> range (likely to conflict?)
>>> irange (likely to be used as a variable name in place of 'i' ?)
>>> irl (not good either)
>>> rangelib (too long?)
>>
>>
>>
>> Tradition would dictate "ranges"
> 
> 
> I'm fine with ranges:: namespace, although I find it a little big 
> (containing too many chars).

I prefer descriptive names, and everyone is free to declare a namespace
alias in his own code...

namespace br = boost::ranges;

Greetings,
Roland

> 
> Best,
> John