From: Matt Hurd (matt.hurd_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-22 18:32:56
IOn Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:53:03 -0500, Jonathan Brandmeyer
> On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 16:06 -0600, Rene Rivera wrote:
> > True, but it will likely be easier to decide on the substance of the
> > logo without the text. No distractions that way. Not that one should
> > forget totally about the text. But it's much easier to think about what
> > can represent Boost, without the word Boost in it.
> > So far I see three different concepts for logo:
> > 1) The "<>" brackets.
> > 2) The "++" operator.
> > 3) The rocket.
> > Perhaps discussing what the logo substance is before getting to deep
> > into the design is best?
I like the concept but not the logo... here is a take on the same
concept without the explicit rocket image and an emphasis on the Open
Source part of <c++ boOSt>
See, you can just type the logo too :-)
happy user of <c++ boOSt>
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk